World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Analytical Thomism

Article Id: WHEBN0000402112
Reproduction Date:

Title: Analytical Thomism  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Anthony Kenny, Peter Geach, Józef Maria Bocheński, Ventimiglia Giovanni, Philosophical movements
Collection: Philosophical Movements
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Analytical Thomism

Analytical Thomism is a philosophical movement which promotes the interchange of ideas between the thought of Saint Thomas Aquinas (including the philosophy carried on in relation to his thinking, called 'Thomism'), and modern analytic philosophy.

Scottish philosopher John Haldane first coined the term in the early 1990s, and has since been one the movement's leading proponents. According to Haldane, "analytical Thomism involves the bringing into mutual relationship of the styles and preoccupations of recent English-speaking philosophy and the ideas and concerns shared by St Thomas and his followers" (Haldane 2004, xii).

Contents

  • History 1
  • Recent philosophical reception of Aquinas 2
  • The field 3
  • See also 4
  • Notes 5
  • References 6

History

The modern revival of Aquinas's thought can be traced to the work of mid-19th Century thomists, such as Tommaso Maria Zigliara, Josef Kleutgen, Gaetano Sanseverino, and Giovanni Maria Cornoldi. This movement received an enormous impetus by Pope Leo XIII's encyclical Aeterni Patris of 1879. In the first half of the twentieth century, Edouard Hugon, Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange, Étienne Gilson, and Jacques Maritain, among others, carried on Leo's call for a Thomist revival (Paterson & Pugh, xiii-xxiii). Gilson and Maritain in particular taught and lectured throughout Europe and North America, influencing a generation of English-speaking Catholic philosophers. Some of the latter then began to harmonize Thomism with broader contemporary philosophical trends.

Similarly, the Kraków Circle in Poland used mathematical logic in presenting Thomism, which the Circle judged to have "a structured body of propositions connected in meaning and subject matter, and linked by logical relations of compatibility and incompatibility, entailment, etc."[1] The Circle has been said to be "the most significant expression of Catholic thought between the two World Wars."[2]

Recent philosophical reception of Aquinas

By the middle of the 20th century Aquinas's thought came into dialogue with the analytical tradition through the work of G. E. M. Anscombe, Peter Geach, and Anthony Kenny. Anscombe was Ludwig Wittgenstein's student, and his successor at the University of Cambridge; she was married to Geach, himself an accomplished logician and philosopher of religion. Geach had converted to Roman Catholicism while studying at Oxford, Anscombe had converted before she came up, and both were instructed in the Faith in Oxford by the Dominican Richard Kehoe, who received them both into the Church before they met one another. Kenny, an erstwhile priest and former Catholic, became a prominent philosopher at the University of Oxford and is still portrayed by some as a promoter of Aquinas (Paterson & Pugh, xiii-xxiii), though his denial of some basic Thomist doctrines (e.g. divine timelessness) casts doubt on this.

Anscombe, and others such as Alasdair MacIntyre, Philippa Foot, and John Finnis, can largely be credited with the revival of "virtue ethics" in analytic moral theory and "natural law theory" in jurisprudence. Both movements draw significantly upon Aquinas.

The field

Philosophers working in the intersection of Thomism and analytic philosophy include: Herbert McCabe, John P. O'Callaghan (Notre Dame), Claude Panaccio (UQAM), Robert Pasnau (CU Boulder), Craig Paterson (Independent Scholar), Roger Pouivet (Nancy, France) Matthew S. Pugh (Providence College), Eleonore Stump (Saint Louis), Thomas Sullivan and Sandra Menssen (University of St. Thomas, MN), Stephen Theron, Denys Turner (Yale), Michael Thompson (Pittsburgh), Giovanni Ventimiglia (Lugano, Switzerland).

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Peter Simons, "Bocheński and Balance: System and History in Analytic Philosophy", Studies in East European Thought, 55(2003) pp. 281-297, reprinted in Edgar Morscher, Otto Neumaier, and Peter Simons (2011), Ein Philosoph mit "Bodenhaftung": Zu Leben und Werk von Joseph M. Bocheński, Sankt Augustin: Academia, pp. 61-79.
  2. ^ Kraków Philosophy http://segr-did2.fmag.unic.it/~polphil/polphil/Cracow/Cracow.html .

References

  • For an excellent overview of Analytical Thomism see the Introduction in Craig Paterson & Matthew S. Pugh (eds.) Analytical Thomism: Traditions in Dialogue (Aldershot and Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2006). Introduction.
  • F.C. Copleston, Aquinas (Penguin, 1955).
  • John Haldane (ed.), "Analytical Thomism" volume of Monist 80 (4) October, 1997.
  • John Haldane, "Thomism and the Future of Catholic Philosophy", New Blackfriars 80 (938), 1999.
  • John Haldane, Faithful Reason: essays Catholic and Philosophical (London and New York: Routledge, 2004).
  • Fergus Kerr, O.P., "Aquinas and Analytic Philosophy: Natural Allies?", Modern Theology 20 (1), 2004.
  • John Finnis, Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (Oxford, 1998).
  • Roger Pouivet, Après Wittgenstein, saint Thomas (PUF, 1997).
  • Anthony J Lisska,Aquinas's Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction (Oxford: New York, 1996).
  • Pérez de Laborda, Miguel, "El tomismo analítico", Philosophica: Enciclopedia filosófica on line 2007
  • Tomismo analitico (Spanish) Article.
  • John C. Cahalan, Causal Realism: An Essay on Philosophical Method and the Foundations of Knowledge (Routledge, 1985)
  • Giovanni Ventimiglia, To be o esse? La questione dell’essere nel tomismo analitico, Carocci, Roma 2012

For somewhat dissenting voices:

  • Alfred Freddoso, Two Roles for Catholic Philosophers
  • Brian J Shanley, OP, The Thomist Tradition (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer, 2002).
  • Entries by Stephen Theron in Haldane (ed.) (1997) and Paterson & Pugh (eds.) (2006).
  • Entries by Shanley and John Knasas in Paterson & Pugh (eds.) (2006).
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from National Public Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.